How would the proliferation of advertising, advertising and entry for "responsible" adults be controlled? What about unlimited entry to children and youths? We'd ultimately have a gargantuan marijuana business like alcohol and tobacco industries, federally and locally regulated. "Follow the money."
Since Federal legislation prohibits marijuana promoting, sellers can't open accounts in banks. Hence they have to store and transport hundreds and hundreds of cash dollars in vehicles. Criminals are salivating! There have been robberies in Colorado, both at dispensaries and while transporting cash. So will autos have armed personnel whereas using? Are we so naive to imagine there can be no shootouts?
How would costs be monitored so illegal promoting would not be revenueable? Given there are proportion strengths for THC (like alcohol), would greater grades be more costly, like beer vs. wine vs. liquor? If authorized prices exceed illegal costs, observe the logical conclusion. In Colorado taxes are being raised because politicians and others in power scent profit. Are we gullible to imagine "black markets" shall stop?
THC has a for much longer half-life than alcohol; it's absorbed in fats tissue and stays within the body and brain. Smoking Marijuana some weeks ago may very well be detectable in a urine drug screen. This causes such quandaries as, what level of THC can be considered impairing? (Watch the court cases explode over this one!) Moreover, how would law enforcement detect numerous more people smoking it after which driving? What about employer's pre-employment and random drug tests with this now authorized substance? Shouldn't zero-tolerance (zero THC %) be the norm?
Let's be honest. Smoke is poisonous fuel, whether or not from burning leaves, wooden, tobacco, or marijuana. Have a Cannabis look at roaches: they are stained with THC and other gunk from joints. How will that affect lungs over time?
Let's be really honest. THC is psychoactive and probably addicting. People who smoke' tolerance builds and each frequency and length increases. As a route of administration, inhaling smoke causes the THC to reach the brain between 5 to 10 seconds. The sooner the excessive, the more potential for elevated use.
Lastly, the "medical" marijuana fiasco permits non-medical personnel promoting untested and unmonitored marijuana. Again, smoke by definition has toxic by-products; some are carcinogens in marijuana, like tobacco. What about absorbed pesticides? (OK, there are marijuana vaporizers which release THC gases and no smoke. "Harm reduction?") Lastly, how would the FDA regulate "medical" inhaled marijuana? Marinol and Ceasmet are RX THC merchandise mainly for chemotherapy-precipitated nausea. There are therapeutic makes use of, to be sure. So why not do trials to smoke opium as a means to anesthetize chronic ache?